"Farming, Conservation, Environmental Groups Oppose Any Tunnels Funding in State Water Bond
Don't Rush to Adopt a Bond in 2013, No Tunnels Mitigation
Sacramento, CA - Californians for Fair Water Policy, a statewide coalition of environmental, water conservation, fishing, farming, Native American and community organizations, today announced their opposition to any State water bond measure that includes any funding to mitigate damage caused by the governor's proposed Peripheral Tunnels to export water. The coalition also opposes any rush to pass a water bond measure in the final week of the 2013 legislative session, and called for action in 2014 after careful deliberation.
"The tunnels would damage water quality, the environment, fish, and farming, and impose billions of dollars of tax increases on the public to mitigate that damage," said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, executive director of Restore the Delta. "The governor wants the public to pay for $7 billion in 'habitat and conservation,' which is required to win permits for the tunnels. That is lipstick on the pig of the tunnels, and we opposed including it in any water bond measure."
"The 'habitat and conservation' would simply enable the draining of the Delta. But habitat and conservation projects paired with tunnel construction would likely fail without sufficient water flows," said Bob Wright, Senior Counsel of Friends of the River.
"It is unwise to include billions of dollars to mitigate a project that has not yet been defined or released,"said Conner Everts, Executive Director, Southern California Watershed. "There are no guarantees that Southern California residents will receive more water, but we'd be paying the major share of the cost of the bonds."
"Beneficiaries should pay for habitat required to mitigate the negative impacts of the tunnels,"said Adam Scow, California Campaigns Director Food & Water Watch. "It's absurd that Governor Brown wants to make us taxpayers pay to redirect the Sacramento River so that oil companies and huge agribusinesses can make even more profits."
Michael Greene, Dir., Legislative Affairs, California State Grange, said, "The proposed tunnels and excessive water exports would devastate sustainable farming. To make taxpayers pay to mitigate damage from this unwise project adds insult to injury."
The coalition urged the governor and legislature to focus a state water bond measure on projects that would increase conservation to generate additional water, improve regional self-reliance, rebuild aging and leaking water infrastructure in urban areas, and provide clean drinking water for all California communities.
Contact information:
Restore the Delta - Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, Barbara [at] restorethedelta.org
So. Cal. Watershed Alliance - Conner Everts, 310.804.6615; connere [at] west.net
Friends of the River - Bob Wright, bwright [at] friendsoftheriver, 916) 442-3155 X207
California State Grange - Michael Greene, legaffairs [at] californiagrange.org; 916-736-1572
Food & Water Watch - Adam Scow, 415-293-9915; ascow [at] fwwatch.org
www.restorethedelta.com
Don't Rush to Adopt a Bond in 2013, No Tunnels Mitigation
Sacramento, CA - Californians for Fair Water Policy, a statewide coalition of environmental, water conservation, fishing, farming, Native American and community organizations, today announced their opposition to any State water bond measure that includes any funding to mitigate damage caused by the governor's proposed Peripheral Tunnels to export water. The coalition also opposes any rush to pass a water bond measure in the final week of the 2013 legislative session, and called for action in 2014 after careful deliberation.
"The tunnels would damage water quality, the environment, fish, and farming, and impose billions of dollars of tax increases on the public to mitigate that damage," said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, executive director of Restore the Delta. "The governor wants the public to pay for $7 billion in 'habitat and conservation,' which is required to win permits for the tunnels. That is lipstick on the pig of the tunnels, and we opposed including it in any water bond measure."
"The 'habitat and conservation' would simply enable the draining of the Delta. But habitat and conservation projects paired with tunnel construction would likely fail without sufficient water flows," said Bob Wright, Senior Counsel of Friends of the River.
"It is unwise to include billions of dollars to mitigate a project that has not yet been defined or released,"said Conner Everts, Executive Director, Southern California Watershed. "There are no guarantees that Southern California residents will receive more water, but we'd be paying the major share of the cost of the bonds."
"Beneficiaries should pay for habitat required to mitigate the negative impacts of the tunnels,"said Adam Scow, California Campaigns Director Food & Water Watch. "It's absurd that Governor Brown wants to make us taxpayers pay to redirect the Sacramento River so that oil companies and huge agribusinesses can make even more profits."
Michael Greene, Dir., Legislative Affairs, California State Grange, said, "The proposed tunnels and excessive water exports would devastate sustainable farming. To make taxpayers pay to mitigate damage from this unwise project adds insult to injury."
The coalition urged the governor and legislature to focus a state water bond measure on projects that would increase conservation to generate additional water, improve regional self-reliance, rebuild aging and leaking water infrastructure in urban areas, and provide clean drinking water for all California communities.
Contact information:
Restore the Delta - Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, Barbara [at] restorethedelta.org
So. Cal. Watershed Alliance - Conner Everts, 310.804.6615; connere [at] west.net
Friends of the River - Bob Wright, bwright [at] friendsoftheriver, 916) 442-3155 X207
California State Grange - Michael Greene, legaffairs [at] californiagrange.org; 916-736-1572
Food & Water Watch - Adam Scow, 415-293-9915; ascow [at] fwwatch.org
www.restorethedelta.com