UPDATED: Call Senator Diane Feinstein Now

Flutterby

Active member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
RO Number
14378
Messages
9,320
"Call Senator Diane Feinstein Now and Let Her Know That You Support Endangered Species Protections for Delta Fisheries and Delta Communities

Restore the Delta has heard from several sources that Senator Diane Feinstein is considering whether or not to sponsor a waiver of the Endangered Species Act for increased pumping from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

While neither Senator Feinstein nor her staff have made such an announcement as of this moment, Sara Woolf, representative of the Westlands Water District, made such a claim as of this morning on talk radio in Fresno: http://kmj580.com/common/global_audio/174/16621.mp3

Increased pumping from the Delta would indeed finish off a number of native species, help to further destroy the commerical salmon fishing industry in California, and significantly worsen water quality for Delta farmers.

Please call Senator Feinstein's staff at the San Francisco Office and let them know that they need to defend the Endangered Species Act for the fisheries and people of the Delta, as well as the majority of Californians who support strong protection of our state's natural resources. The number is (415) 393-0707.

Thank you!

Restore the Delta Staff "

or email: http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.EmailMe

Saturday, Feb 13, 2010

"Senator Feinstein's willingness to suspend Endangered Species Act protections for Chinook salmon

Announced first by Westlands Water District on the radio yesterday and confirmed in this morning's San Francisco Chronicle-has stunned her constituents in the Delta, Northern California, and much of the rest of the state.

Unemployment is indeed high in some valley towns, but it has been consistently high for years, due to the seasonal nature of large-scale irrigated agriculture. How many times do we have to point out to our senior Senator that the subprime mortgage crisis and housing implosion are responsible for most of the recent job losses in the San Joaquin Valley? UOP studies estimate that 47,000 construction jobs were lost in the San Joaquin Valley, as opposed to 8,500 jobs in agriculture, 6,500 of those due to the drought and likely to return this year.

The reservoirs are filling. Agricultural contractors with senior water rights got 100% of their water allocations in 2009. Some contractors even had enough left over to sell for development in other parts of the state, and the Kern Water Bank continues to be healthy. The situation on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley is not typical of the entire Valley. This is the region with junior water rights and impaired soils whose growing thirst and unwise crop choices have driven the decline of the Delta ecosystem, the loss of water quality for farmers in the Delta, and two years of closure of the salmon fishing industry at an annual cost of $1.4 billion and the loss of 23,000 jobs.

Does the Senator really want to sacrifice those 23,000 jobs permanently for the sake of the estimated 2,000 agricultural jobs tied to ESA-related cutbacks?

Senator Feinstein has an admirable record of insisting that we face facts with regard to climate change and energy. Last September, she delivered comments on the Senate floor with respect to efforts to prohibit the EPA from using any funds to enforce the Clean Air Act to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources. The Senator said,
"The Flat Earth Society cannot prevail. [. . .] What we do here to protect our planet Earth for the next generations is so key and critical." She needs to apply this same clear-sighted concern for the future to water resources in the state she represents.

The days when California can sustain high levels of irrigated agriculture, especially on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, are over, and lifting environmental restrictions now will simply prolong the pain for agribusiness and for individual workers as the economy adjusts to depending less on water transfers. It is vital that this area recalibrate itself to work with the water that it can reasonably expect to receive given the state's variable precipitation and given its junior water rights under the water project contracts."

From Restorethedelta.com
 
Flutterby: Thanks for keeping us up to date on this water battle. Here is what I sent to Dearest Diane. Sounds like it might be time for her retirement!!!! We need to let all the politicians know this is about more than just a finger long fish.

The San Joaquin Sacramento Delta is an endangered sensitive Eco system. The current level of water being pumped out of this system has already caused numerous environmental problems for the Delta and San Francisco Bay. This is not only about the Delta Smelt but all fish including the Salmon run depends on the balance and change of salt to fresh water in the Bay and Delta.
The pumping has already destroyed numerous habitats and has brought salt water into areas that use to be fresh water. This salt intrusion is killing crops in the Delta, contaminating drinking water that several bay area and Northern CA cities depend on.
The primary water rights belong to the natural flow of the river. The Fresno area and Southern CA are not a part of this. Southern CA can use desalinization plants to transfer salt water to fresh. This is not desired by Southern CA because of the cost. There is not a lack of water in Southern CA or the Central Valley. There is however, a lack of cheep water in these areas. To kill the Delta Eco System, the farm lands of the Delta, Northern CA economy, and the drinking water of Northern CA, so that central valley farmers can save money, is not a viable exchange.
There is a lot of talk that you are going to sponsor a bill to wave the Endangered Species Act so that more water can be pumped from the Delta. DO NOT DO THIS! It is unthinkable to kill Northern CA water, farming, recreation, fishing, Eco systems, and economy, so that a small but vociferous group can profit. For Central Valley Farmers this fight is not about the water, it is about the profit. Please do not let this vociferous crowd fool you.
 
Thanks, ER, and welcome to the forums! I too sent an email to her which was not nearly as well expressed as yours. I hope I made my point.

As all can see, she is indeed taking a position against the Delta Ecosystem. We need to FLOOD her with emails and telephone calls! Please do it now!!!!!!
 
Here is the Chronicle article:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/12/MNBT1C05E1.DTL

I sure am glad to have Rep. Mike Thompson in my 1st congressional district.

Senator Feinstein has turned her back on northern California. She is pro-water grab: right down to the two 33' tunnels they want to use to pull more water from just south of Sacramento. She should be recalled, IMO. Your opinion via email or phone is critical now. Don't forget to tell your elected officials who are doing the right thing that you stand behind them.
 
yzer, thanks for that most important information. I will definitely NOT support her!!!!!
 
Back
Top