Don't gripe about my poop tank

rduhon

Active member
exMember
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
RO Number
29321
Messages
3,348
SAN FRANCISCO - Last weekend, 890,000 gallons of raw sewage and stormwater spilled into San Francisco Bay from an overloaded World War II-era treatment plant. Five days earlier, a ruptured pipe released 400,000 gallons of filth into the bay.

And those were just the big spills the public heard about.

On average, human waste spills into the San Francisco Bay more than five times a day, fouling the waters and shorelines of this environmental jewel and recreational treasure.

Decrepit pipes, outdated municipal sewage treatment systems and poor upkeep have been blamed for many of the spills into one the world's most famous and beautiful natural harbors. And some of the Bay Area's wealthiest communities have been identified as some of the most persistent polluters.

"It's like living in a situation sort of like a Third World country, where there's poor sanitary management," said Sejal Choksi of the environmental group San Francisco Baykeeper.

Some spills have been blamed not only for killing large numbers of fish but for causing respiratory infections, skin and eye irritation and diarrhea in swimmers. Signs warning against water contact are a common sight at beaches and marinas for those who swim, fish or sailboard in the bay, especially after storms.

Rick Avery, 47, of the Dolphin Swimming & Boating Club in San Francisco, said two of his bay swimming companions decided to stay out of the water after the 400,000-gallon spill last week. Avery said he once he became sick from swimming after a storm, when sewage systems often are overloaded. He had a stuffy nose and other cold symptoms.

"The water was so dirty that day, and we still swam," Avery said. "That was the only time that I got sick and handful of other people got sick."

In 2008 alone, more than 2,000 spills dumped an estimated 15 million gallons of raw or partially treated human waste into the waters of the bay, state officials said.

On Sunday and Monday, the east San Francisco Bay city of Richmond's more than half-century-old sewage system was overloaded by rain and spewed 890,000 gallons of filth mixed with rainwater. Officials said the system's deteriorating, leaky clay pipes cannot handle the extra load after a storm.

On Feb. 17, a 23-year-old pipe ruptured along the shoreline of Sausalito in well-to-do Marin County and sent a 400,000-gallon plume of waste into the bay, forcing health warnings on nearby beaches for more than a week and the closing of a fishing pier. Officials blamed shoddy workmanship and corrosion.

"A number of California jurisdictions have let their infrastructure age beyond the breaking point," said William L. Rukeyser, a state water board spokesman.

In January 2008, a 2.5-million-gallon sewage spill in Marin County led to fines by the state and federal government and beach closings north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Regulators accused the Sewerage Agency of Southern Marin of holding on to almost $550,000 that could have been used for maintenance for preventing such spills.

And last month, the Environmental Protection Agency ordered the East Bay Municipal Utility District - which provides sewer service to about 10 cities, including hardscrabble Oakland, wealthy Walnut Creek, the environmentally conscious college town of Berkeley, and middle-class Hayward - to spend $2 million a year to fix leaky pipes that were allowing sewage to flow into the bay.

The EPA this week released $283 million in economic stimulus money earmarked for sewage system upgrades in California. But that is only a fraction of the needed repairs. San Jose alone has a sewage treatment plant that is more than 50 years old, and a $1 billion, 10-year plan to fix it.

"The sewer lines in the ground are indeed old. In San Francisco, it's over 100 years old," said Bruce Wolfe, executive officer for the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. "There's a lot of effort that goes into maintenance, but one can only put enough Band-Aids on something for a time. At some point you've got to do a full remodel."
 
What I don't understand is banning the use of a good Certified class 1 or 2 treatment systems in tidal NDZs. This makes no sense to me.
Bill
 
The concept is something like having a Diet cola with your "death-by-chocolate" cake ( with whipped cream ). Every little bit helps... ;)
 
Now I know why there was so much corn floating in the bay on my last visit...

RWS
 
This outrage has been going on in San Francisco Bay for many years. The worst offender is wealthy Marin country. They are OK with driving Hummers and BMWs to their $1 million homes but can never find enough money to upgrade sewage treatment plants that are 50 years out of date. Guess they don't like tax increases (sounds familiar).

The only NDZ in northern CA is Richardson Bay which is in Marin County. I've seen a number of newspaper articles and environmental groups cite the example of boaters who can't use Type 1 systems while water treatment plants dump raw sewage into the Bay every year. The environmental groups aren't dumping on boaters anymore because there are much bigger fish to fry. Still, I don't think any body of water that has been declared an NDZ has ever been taken off the list. Richardson Bay was made an NDZ to protect oyster beds but the whole idea is pointless if the Bay Area cities continue to dump raw sewage.
 
For decades the excuse in SF and elsewhere has been old systems, human error, overloaded system, storm run off, accident etc. There is always money and interest for hostile treatment of boaters but these "accidents' that dump many times the amount of a few boats continue. They happen in every part of the country and the story is always the same, persecute the boaters but excuse the huge dumps from the plants.
 
quote:

Originally posted by yzer

This outrage has been going on in San Francisco Bay for many years. The worst offender is wealthy Marin country. They are OK with driving Hummers and BMWs to their $1 million homes but can never find enough money to upgrade sewage treatment plants that are 50 years out of date. Guess they don't like tax increases (sounds familiar).

The only NDZ in northern CA is Richardson Bay which is in Marin County. I've seen a number of newspaper articles and environmental groups cite the example of boaters who can't use Type 1 systems while water treatment plants dump raw sewage into the Bay every year. The environmental groups aren't dumping on boaters anymore because there are much bigger fish to fry. Still, I don't think any body of water that has been declared an NDZ has ever been taken off the list. Richardson Bay was made an NDZ to protect oyster beds but the whole idea is pointless if the Bay Area cities continue to dump raw sewage.




Would this be the area where #3 in the US government flys her private jet to and fro?
 
Oh, no: say it ain't so! #3 rides in a big private jet? No, in fact, it ain't so. No private jet for Our Speaker, who demands to be flitted from DC to SFO nonstop. Furthermore, she's too important to have to ride in a mere six-seat Falcon, and stop halfway for refueling as previous Speakers have done. Speaker Pelosi rides whenever she wishes in a USAF C-32, which is equivalent to a Boeing 757. Paid for you and me, and piloted by on-duty USAF pilots. Nice, eh? But those eeeevil corporate CEOs are instructed to dismantle their companies' flight departments, no matter how much money they demonstrably save the company. The rules are different for powerful Dems. (let's not even think about gummint SUVs and Oval Office thermostat settings, and AF1 jaunts an hour down the road.Environment, my Aunt Fannie.) And now we hear about the hundreds of thousands of gallons of raw sewage discharge in SFO Bay, which is far less harmful than a few boaters' type I treatment equipment. That's ok- in SFO, their $#!^ don't stink, no how.
 
I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
 
Back
Top