MOtor hours on 1988 Carver Santego 2767

Sacriverfolks

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
RO Number
30800
Messages
55
Hello. I am considering offer and purchase of a 1988 2767 Santego with the twin 3.7 L four cylinder engines. They have 954 hours on tham and I would like to know rb2@gr5t where this is in the life of these smaller motors and how much this should bear on the final price (the list is $23,900).

Thanks!
 
With regard to anything but a brand new engine, engine hours only form a part of the lifespan equation.

Dependent on other conditions, the stated hours might indicate that you have as much as 80% of the engines life remaining, or as little as 00.1% remaining. That the boat is being sold is an indication of shorter remaining lifespan rather than longer ;)

The only way to get a "sensible" answer is to get an engine survey ( and not from the seller or seller's broker ).

In order for an engine to have a long life, it must be operated responsibly, often ( at least once a week for more than 15 min ), not abused, and properly maintained, continuously. Any deviation from that procedure will shorten the life. And the only way to determine the estimated remaining lifespan is to have it carefully inspected by an engine ( not hull ) suryeyor. Any one else is just stating a SWAG ( such as I did at the top ).

Buying a boat without separate hull and engine surveys is a dice roll.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Radioactive

With regard to anything but a brand new engine, engine hours only form a part of the lifespan equation.

Dependent on other conditions, the stated hours might indicate that you have as much as 80% of the engines life remaining, or as little as 00.1% remaining. That the boat is being sold is an indication of shorter remaining lifespan rather than longer ;)

The only way to get a "sensible" answer is to get an engine survey ( and not from the seller or seller's broker ).

In order for an engine to have a long life, it must be operated responsibly, often ( at least once a week for more than 15 min ), not abused, and properly maintained, continuously. Any deviation from that procedure will shorten the life. And the only way to determine the estimated remaining lifespan is to have it carefully inspected by an engine ( not hull ) suryeyor. Any one else is just stating a SWAG ( such as I did at the top ).

Buying a boat without separate hull and engine surveys is a dice roll.






There are many Marine surveyors who also do engine surveys. Just ask before you assume. As for lifetime of engines. I have absolutely never seen a marine engine wear out. Their owner kill them, by lack of maintenance, and proper operation.. And don't go by just what the engine surveyor says.

Example.. 3 years ago I surveyed a 32 foot that had already had a satisfactory engine survey, listing engine compression and everything, it even had the hour meters replaced and had 28 hours. It was advertised as new engines. During the survey I found an old survey on the boat from 2 years before. Checking the serial numbers I found them to be the same from 2 years before. I asked the broker & owner to explain this. The buyer was in shock. When back at the dock the owner went to his car and produced two receipts, number one listed the port engine as a full rebuild, and listed everything from pistons, crank, valve job etc. The STB engine said. Replaced #7 & #8 pistons, and a note that this engine should not be considered rebuilt. Also on this invoice was a line entry of 980 dollars for steam cleaning port & STB engines, and engine compartment, and repainting.

So don't rely only on an engine surveyor. Good "Small Craft" surveyor not "Hull Surveyors" are worth their weight in gold.. Fred
 
Good example Fred. I get a kick out of the some so called rebuilds. A power wash and a $1.99 can of spray paint and they can't come up with any receipts.

By they way, twin 4 cylinders in a 27/28 footer, I feel is a little underpowered.

Gary Washienko
Sound Marine Survey
 
Hey Fred,

Thanks for the great example! I can't count how many times i have seen this also. Over spray on the hoses are a dead give away.
 
Thanks for the advice. We have settled on a final price of $16,250 and the next step is financing and then a haulout and survey. I have been recommended on another forum to use Steven MacNear out of Davis, CA. Anyone with any knowledge of him?
 
I hope the financing is contingent on a successful survey.
 
fmoor, no offense intended. I believe that the hull and engine should each be surveyed by a surveyor competent to survey the object specified. If this happens to be the same individual, and the two types of survey are combined into a single price package, fine. But it is inappropriate to rely upon a hull surveyor's opinion of an engine if he is only qualified for hulls ( and vice versa ).

In all cases the survey should be done by a person not associated with the seller/seller's broker, but acting on your behalf.

I happen to be one of those people who think surveys are an important tool, not just as a buyer's resource, but also as a second set of eyes looking for thinks that need attention. No survey is perfect, nor can it be expected to be. But a good survey is quite valuable and highly recommended.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Radioactive

fmoor, no offense intended. I believe that the hull and engine should each be surveyed by a surveyor competent to survey the object specified. If this happens to be the same individual, and the two types of survey are combined into a single price package, fine. But it is inappropriate to rely upon a hull surveyor's opinion of an engine if he is only qualified for hulls ( and vice versa ).

In all cases the survey should be done by a person not associated with the seller/seller's broker, but acting on your behalf.

I happen to be one of those people who think surveys are an important tool, not just as a buyer's resource, but also as a second set of eyes looking for thinks that need attention. No survey is perfect, nor can it be expected to be. But a good survey is quite valuable and highly recommended.






I absolutely agree with you. I was simply saying not to assume a "Small Craft Surveyor" is only proficient on Hulls, I know several that are also engine surveyors. You should always ask, as you could save money.. Fred
 
I have only found one surveyor so far in our area that advertises as a hull/engine/outdrive surveyor. I intend to call and see if I can get a feel for what his qualifications are to handle both sides of the survey and if he passes muster and is reasonably priced as a combo then I will use him. Pretty much all contigencies by CA state contractual agreement can kill the deal (including financing; survey; sea trial) with no loss to me except monies already paid for the haulout/survey. i am also waiting to see the list (supposedly of three) of surveyors from the broker and cross reference with what I have found and been recommended to.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Sacriverfolks

I have only found one surveyor so far in our area that advertises as a hull/engine/outdrive surveyor. I intend to call and see if I can get a feel for what his qualifications are to handle both sides of the survey and if he passes muster and is reasonably priced as a combo then I will use him. Pretty much all contigencies by CA state contractual agreement can kill the deal (including financing; survey; sea trial) with no loss to me except monies already paid for the haulout/survey. i am also waiting to see the list (supposedly of three) of surveyors from the broker and cross reference with what I have found and been recommended to.






I would trash any recommendation that come from the broker. Don't think for one minute that they will recommend anyone who will find very many things wrong. The best compliment I have ever had was from a broker "I will never recommend you again, you kill every deal I have".. To which I reply.. thank you. I don't need your recommendations.. Fred
 
Funny thing Fred, my normal natural instinct (as a former salesman) is to NOT trust ANYTHING a salesman tells me and look for my own info/help. What I find fascinating is that whenever I mention that I have been asking questions and getting recommendations from guys online at the club sites who have decades of boating experience and know how, they immediately put down/pooh pooh the things that I have learned through hours and hours of patient and careful research as incorrect or made up. This standard tactic immediately puts my guard up.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Sacriverfolks

Funny thing Fred, my normal natural instinct (as a former salesman) is to NOT trust ANYTHING a salesman tells me and look for my own info/help. What I find fascinating is that whenever I mention that I have been asking questions and getting recommendations from guys online at the club sites who have decades of boating experience and know how, they immediately put down/pooh pooh the things that I have learned through hours and hours of patient and careful research as incorrect or made up. This standard tactic immediately puts my guard up.






Thats interesting. I as you trust only things I know for an absolute fact. The amazing thing is all of the advice you can get from people who can only turn the key, anything else is beyond them. I also spent years in sales, so also know exactly how it works. Although my sales was not in the boating industry, it was in a very large industry.

The normal buyer doesn't understand the process of boat sales. If they thought about it for a while they would.

1) Would a broker be able to get contracts to sale a boat unless he didn't tell his client he can get the highest price for their vessel? If All told the truth, their would be no financial gain over picking one broker over another to sell you boat. So the search for the highest price artificially drives up the price.

2) would a broker be able to get contacts if he didn't tell his potential customer. "We will add my 10% commission right on top we will get it"

3) Would a broker ever recommend a surveyor that finds many things wrong with the boat? Potentially killing the deal.

4) what is the reason all brokers have a non-disclosure about "offered in good faith". I know one broker who told me when I had a boat for sale.. "I don't want to know anything about it, or I will have to disclose it. Further I don't want you to talk to anyone about the boat they need to talk to me". This was from a boat with nothing wrong. I sold it myself 2 months later.

There is a very large marina over on the west Florida coast. 95% of the boats are listed by one broker. Every surveyor I know does NOT work at this marina. Except one, who handles 99% of this brokers surveys. Could anyone guess why. BTW the broker recommends him only 100% of the time.

I have done re-surveys for people who want to take the surveyor and broker to court for "price fixing".

Its kinda like the ex SAMS South East Region Manager, you know the person who is responsible to insure the membership is ethical. He was and still is a broker. (and yes the home office knew it) He is also a captain so I have been stuck on some surveys for boats he sold. They were hell. Everything from surveyors don't need to look at that, to telling my customers was unethical and was biased because he was a SAMS surveyor and I was not.

BTW I am not a SAMS bigit. Every organization has its bad apples. But people should understand the marketing process. It is everywhere from the boat broker to the surveyor organizations. I still fail to understand why a certifying organization needs to spend huge amounts of money to get people to use their members.

IEEE does not do this for engineers.
Nor does any certifying organization for nursing, doctors, not even plumbers.

Only in the surveying industry.

If you look any where else in industry, Training organizations "Accredit", and Organizations "Certify" their membership has the training they claim. It simply amazes me the sham to the public. Only in the boating industry does the largest surveying organization do both.

I tracked for a couple of years one broker. During that time 100% of the boats they sold was reported to Soldboat.com (devision of yachtworld) as 20% over the selling price. One day I asked him why.

"If all brokers told the truth about what boats were sold for we would not able able to get anyone to list their boats with us"

Most brokers use soldboats.com as their selling tool to show their customers what they can get when selling.. Anyway off my soap box.. Fred
 
Sacriverfolks-remember it is not only the engines that are expensive items at the stern of the boat, you also have the drives. You should have the drives pulled, alignment checked, gimbals checked etc. Not cheap to have this done to2 motors but if there are things that need servicing you can negotiate a price deduction or walk.
 
Thanks again guys for the help. I am not at all surprised at any of this Fred, as while we have been shopping we have seen listings from both brokers and private parties. The discrepancy in the pricing is obvious - especially when you look at the boats in person and see that there is no difference in the quality of the boats sided by side. The ONLY reasion that we ended up going the broker route is that we wanted a bit more boat and to do that we needed to get into financing. We thought this would be easier going through an established broker than private - especially since it is very difficult right now to get any financing through banks on 15+ year-old boats, and newer is just out of our current price range.
 
OK Fred here's an update. The Carver purchase is off due to not being able to find financing in a reasonable % range for the age. After some of the things that you guys have told me here, I must say that there is a part of me that is a little relieved because I was still a little scared about the potential motor/drive issues due to the hours.

So on to plan "B"! That is a 1988 Bayliner 2858 Command Bridge that was inherited recently by a friend/co-worker who is more than willing to carry the paper himself (he is aware of our search and the fact that finding reasonable financing has been nearly impossible for boats of this age/class). He has already insisted on having it surveyed himself and I have advised him re: making sure to have the motor/drive done as well.

So what are you thoughts about this boat? It has the King Cobra Mercruiser (Ford) 460 and OMC drive. It needs a good cleaning and probably (soon) a reupholster of all the cushions/seating. His dad lived aboard but also used it for regular fishing trips until his death rb2@gr5t 3 months ago. I have already had a chance to fire the motor and test the accessories (all seem to work fine) but not yet actually take it out as he is still in the process of removing all his father's personal belongings.

Your thoughts on this?
 
Will,

Watch out for the 460 and OMC King Cobra Drive! As far as i know, Merc never made a King Cobra drive system. OMC had alot of problems with this drive system! Also, the Ford 460 engine has been troublesome. The boat itself has a good reputation, with a very nice layout.
 
Al is dead on. The King Cobra is 100% OMC. The engine might have Merc. a flame arrester, or valve covers, but the setup should be OMC. The King Cobra is very difficult to find some parts for. FWIW, OMC was was bought out by Volvo Penta around 1995. I have never checked, but it "might" be possible to swap the drive to a Volvo drive without major transom work. I do know that VP started using the basic OMC drive and continue to use the transom mounting plate today.

Ken
 
Will-there is a pretty active online Bayliner Owners Forum (baylinerowners.org I think. You can google it) that can probably give you some feedback on the boat and motor/drive combo.
 
Back
Top