Rush to Build Peripheral Tunnels

Flutterby

Active member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
RO Number
14378
Messages
9,320
"Restore the Delta Responds to Brown Administration's Rush to Build Peripheral Tunnels Around the Delta:

If they wanted to protect fish they wouldn't have exported record-high water levels the past few years

SACRAMENTO, CA - Restore the Delta (RTD), a coalition opposed to the Brown Administration's rush to construct massive Peripheral Tunnels to take millions of acre-feet of water from the Delta, mainly to benefit mega-growers on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, responded to the Administration's proposed water diversion proposal.

Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, executive director of RTD, said, "Time and time again, the best available Delta science has shown that Delta Smelt and other threatened fish species are on the brink of collapse due to too much water being taken out of the Delta. In the face of the threatened extinction of fish species, the Brown Administration has presided over record-high water exports. Where was their deep concern for the Delta smelt, salmon and other species during the past two years? The Peripheral Tunnel proponents are proposing a new diversion for one purpose: get the Peripheral Tunnels built ASAP.

"For state officials to say that changing the diversion point is to protect Delta smelt, and not simply to provide more water for export, is disingenuous. The water-takers have failed for decades to install fish screens that work. Why would we believe their new Peripheral Tunnels would properly screen fish? The technology for the fish screens to be placed at the new diversion point has not yet been developed. How can the Administration advocate that changing the diversion point with new intakes is the silver bullet to help Delta smelt, when they don't know if it will work? In addition, they don't know if fish can recover and survive when passing three large intakes.

"There are laws that must be followed. Officials cannot simply change the diversion point for Delta exports. They will have to move through processes with the State Water Resources Control Board, and show that this change will not have an adverse impact on Delta communities."
http://campaign.r20.constantcontact...MHkGTCmh5TwGMY-ucSK9sF-rBu3dpKLhYnPh-kpeLAQ==

www.restorethedelta.org
 
Thanks. I know it is a losing battle due to the political climate in the state, but I hope people are at least aware of what is going on.....90% of the people I talk to on this topic are totally clueless! Guess not many of them read this forum LOL
 
We are very aware of this along with many of our friends in Discovery Bay. There was a meeting held last week on this topic and there were more than 200 ppl in attendance. However, there are many people that are not aware. We need to keep getting the information (and petitions)out to anyone and everyone.
 
I'm glad to hear that meeting was so well attended! We had a FREE showing of the documentary here in Amador County and it was very poorly attended and got no press.... But at least the Saving the Mokelumne River of the Foothill Conservancy is having small victories against EBMUD.

http://www.foothillconservancy.org/pages/wshome2.cgi

I encourage everyone to keep getting the word out! Thanks for being part of the solution.
 
Back
Top