Statewide Drought Declared, First Since 1991

Flutterby

Active member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
RO Number
14378
Messages
9,320
"SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is proclaiming a statewide drought after two years of below-average rainfall, low snow melt runoff and the largest court-ordered restrictions on water transfers in state history.

His office said he would issue an executive order Wednesday directing the state's response to unusually dry conditions that are damaging crops, harming water quality and causing extreme fire danger across California.

Many communities already are requiring water conservation or rationing to deal with the shortfall.

Schwarzenegger's statewide drought declaration is the first since 1991, when Gov. Pete Wilson acted in the fifth year of a drought that lasted into 1992.

The executive order directs the state Department of Water Resources to speed water transfers to areas with the worst shortages.

It also tells state officials to help local water districts with conservation efforts and directs agencies to help farmers suffering losses from the drought.

In addition, the governor is naming two "water czars," one to coordinate conservation programs and the other to speed water transfers around the state.bolding is mine

California depends on winter snow accumulating in the Sierra Nevada for much of its summer water supply.

But March, April and May were the driest winter months on record, forcing water use cutbacks by farmers and urban residents alike.

The governor is warning that conditions could be even worse in 2009 if there is another dry winter.

Snow measurements last month found the Sierra held just 69 percent of an average winter, and that runoff into California rivers was at just 55 percent of a normal year.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation said this week it would cut water supplied to Central Valley farms to 40 percent of the amount growers contract for with the federal government.

That could mean hundreds of acres of crops won't be planted this year, according to the giant Westlands Water District, which supplies growers who produce about $1 billion worth of crops each year.

Schwarzenegger is using the drought declaration to push his nearly $12 billion proposal to build more reservoirs and a canal to direct water around the troubled Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.bolding is mine

The delta funnels Northern California water to giant pumps that send it to central and southern California cities and farms. But a federal court order last year requires that more of the water be left for declining fish populations.

The governor wants voters to approve a $12 billion bond to fund delta, river and groundwater improvements, conservation and recycling efforts, and reservoirs. But legislators have not agreed to the plan despite ongoing negotiations with the administration.

Schwarzenegger reiterated in Wednesday's prepared remarks that he is committed to getting a bipartisan legislative agreement for a bond measure.

"This drought is an urgent reminder of the immediate need to upgrade California's water infrastructure," Schwarzenegger said. "There is no more time to waste because nothing is more vital to protect our economy, our environment and our quality of life."

http://www.kcra.com/water/16494234/detail.html
 
It will be interesting to learn who is required to ration water and who keeps using it without any restrictions. I bet SoCal has few restrictions if any!
 
It should be a call to conserve and will be interesting to see what happens. As Gnarley said, I bet SoCal has no restrictions. I think its a good time to raise the price of water to force the issue. I beleive someone said the water from the Delta is the cheapest in SoCal.
Funny how the Gov used this as a reason to fund the canal, instead of pushing harder for conservation.

Thanks Flutter.

Jim
 
Well, the Governator did declare a statewide drought. But I remember in another statewide drought, SoCal had a mandatory 10% reduction and NoCal had a mandatory 25%. There was talk then of splitting the state into two seperate states. I'm all for that, but SoCal has majority votes, sooooo.

Also, remember that Arnold is from SoCal and he remains biased towards SoCal interests! [:-banghead] [:-censored]
 
when do they start to blame global warming??
 
quote:

Originally posted by pdecat

when do they start to blame global warming??





Sure, this idea is absurd but Gov. Schwarzenegger and his Blue Ribbon Task Force are already using the global warming issue in their attempt to grab increased water exports from the Delta.

Schwarzenegger claims CA will be getting less and less rainfall during the next 100 years and that sea level in the Delta will rise three inches. Because that kind of sea level rise will destroy the natural delta as we know it, Schwarzenegger doesn't think there is any reason to try to restore Delta environment.

CALFED Science did nearly all of the science borrowed by the Task Force. When they were asked about the Governor's global warming reasoning, CALFED Science replied that they had no data or models available to support claims about global warming and it's supposed effects on the Delta, or how that should play into plans for California's water future.
 
Is Governor Schwarzenegger jumping the gun just a little bit on calling this a drought? Maybe calling this year a drought has some advantage in frightening voters into accepting his Delta water scheme.

This is dry year number 1. One dry year does not make a drought: that's why we have all of those dams, isn't it?

Here are the facts, up to date as of May, 2008.
http://cdec.water.ca.gov/snow/bulletin120/b120may08.pdf

This table shows how much water we have stored in every friggin' water storage zone in the state of California on May 1, 2008. Does this look like a water emergency? Ready for water rationing?

may2008storagea.jpg
 
Some years ago when I lived in CA there was a prolonged drought. All sorts of man made calamities were blamed for the lack of rain. Then some enterprising reporter from the Mercury News researched old mission records. When the drought years were plotted along with 150 year data from the missions the "extraordinary drought” years were indistinguishable from the long term pattern, albeit on the low end.

Naturally the liberal press never blamed the shortage of water on increased demand from increased population using more water, exactly like oil today. The rain is the same as it has always been but too many people need water, and oil.

Sadly the art history majors now calling themselves reporters wouldn’t know how to do the research and their liberal guilt wouldn’t allow then to consider the truth.
 
It's worse than just superficial and uncritical reporting. Most of the Northern California news agencies want the water business advertising accounts and have plenty of reasons to assign numbnutz reporters to cover water issues.
 
yzer, if my memory is still working, in 2005-6, we had 200% precipitation in northern California. Then in 2006-5, we were way down in precip, but the reservoirs were still in good shape due to the previous year. But this year, 2007-8, we are down even more then last year resulting in two years in a row of low precip and many of the reservoirs are down too. I heard on KCRA last night that Oroville was down to 50% of capacity. However, we all know capacity is the maximum not the average.
 
Here are the last four years of California water storage tables.

May 1, 2005
storageMay2005.jpg


May 1, 2006
storageMay2006.jpg


May 1, 2007
storageMay2007.jpg


May 1, 2008
may2008storagea.jpg


There are CA regions that are hit harder by water shortages than others, but given last year's water usage (ignoring additional rationing or conservation) the state still has at least three years of water left if CA gets only 65% precipitation during the next three years (which is unlikely.)
 
I think our rat-bastard governor is simply trying to swing the public's perception so that he can shove the peripheral canal(or whatever it's called now) through with less opposition. I'm ashamed to say that I voted for him. He has done nothing to preserve our fishing rights and is actively selling the Delta down the river.
 
quote:

Originally posted by AbsoLoot

I think our rat-bastard governor is simply trying to swing the public's perception so that he can shove the peripheral canal(or whatever it's called now) through with less opposition. I'm ashamed to say that I voted for him. He has done nothing to preserve our fishing rights and is actively selling the Delta down the river.





I agree. I was so mad about President Clinton and Gov. Davis that I re-registered as a Non-partisan in 2000. I voted for both the Davis recall and for Schwarzenegger. The latter was the dumbest vote I ever made. [:(!]
 
I spoke with our CPA yesterday who lives in LA and she advised me that they are going to be required to ration water usage. However, Beverly Hills home owners are the biggest abusers, as some of their lawns are bigger than many NorCal home footprints.

The Governor's motives may be suspicious and subject to scrutiny and speculation (deserved and earned) but it seems he is going to unilaterally put it to all Californians.

Bill
 
AbsoLoot, I wish you would voice your opinion! :D:D:D BTW, I agree with you 100%.

We must all stay vigilant and fight to save our delta. Do NOT be fooled by the Governator or anyone else who comes from SoCal!
 
Hummmm I seem to remember the ecofreaks have removed some dams in CA. Weren’t they trying to remove Hetch hetchy??
 
That movement seems to have been replaced with water conservation issues. The idea was to "save the valley" which Hetch Hetch flooded. Well, hello! It would take 100+ yrs to have that valley look natural again. It was destroyed when they built the dam. Too late now.
 
for a state with so many smart people they are really stupid except for work issues.
 
I don't think the "smart" folks get involved with politics; they are too busy creating the next thingamajig to pay attention. Too bad!
 
certainly not true un the liberal lunacy of silicon valley, menlo park, SF or berserkely
 
Back
Top