I agree fully that he didn't pay for an engine survey, and that there is no way a hull survey is going to be able to tell if a mechanical item will fail (neither will an engine survey for that matter)
However, I'm taking him at his word that ALL the surveyor wrote and said was the "The engine appears and operated well indicating it is in good condition" nothing else, no caveats, no warnings like the surveyor above puts in his survey, no nothing...we have the whole story.
If that is the case and then both engines failed within a couple of hours, that just is not a good survey. Not responsible for damages, but that just is not a good survey.
Captinmb, did he check the oil after you ran it?? (assuming for at least 20-30min). Did he check the temps with a heat gun while it was running?? The surveys I've always had assumed (correctly) that the person had just changed the oil, etc, and checked for milkiness after running at WOT. In my last boat the surveyor found that an impeller was going bad, put it in the report and I had to have a mechanic replace. There's no guarantee period on anything except new,
However, I'm taking him at his word that ALL the surveyor wrote and said was the "The engine appears and operated well indicating it is in good condition" nothing else, no caveats, no warnings like the surveyor above puts in his survey, no nothing...we have the whole story.
If that is the case and then both engines failed within a couple of hours, that just is not a good survey. Not responsible for damages, but that just is not a good survey.
Captinmb, did he check the oil after you ran it?? (assuming for at least 20-30min). Did he check the temps with a heat gun while it was running?? The surveys I've always had assumed (correctly) that the person had just changed the oil, etc, and checked for milkiness after running at WOT. In my last boat the surveyor found that an impeller was going bad, put it in the report and I had to have a mechanic replace. There's no guarantee period on anything except new,